Claude Debussy said, “Music is the space between notes.”
Do not read this story: Listen to it. The words will echo in your head, and as they dissolve into the paintings of your mind’s eye, I hope the world you see inside will release your sleeping soul from the bondages of our modern conventions.
The young minds of today have been reformed, crafted into red-hot machines, combusting at speeds unfathomable a century ago. At one-hundred and forty beats-per-minute, and with the necessary supplement of alcohol, energy drinks and amphetamines, the anthems of this newest generation ignite an insatiable adrenaline in our factory-house children. They send hot lithium through our bones; they synchronize with the machine-pulse. This, is how we choose to lose ourselves in these brave, new times; by pumping our bodies with synthetics, to experience a maximized performance of endorphins, serotonins, and the other chemical codes our calculative 21st century minds have made us believe we are in totality. What we are doing, is flooding the temple.
Abandon our apprehensive, scientific attitude, treating our existence like a cold, indifferent code. The young, modern, ‘educated’ American takes it as given that we are occurrences made up of systematic building blocks; that our divinity was a mirage from an older, ignorant world. We take existence as something like secret machinery, which can be exploited for our performance, for our pleasures and our stimulations, to be ‘plugged’ in again and again.
I couldn’t have told you about this passion inside me until I went to one of these gatherings typical to our time. At that time, I understood rationally that these large parties, full of child-men and child-women, learning to work in the modern economy, had their potential for joy and ecstasy. If you couldn’t find the ecstasy within you, it was readily and eagerly sold in one of the rooms of this house.
These parties full of orgy-porgy, soma, and centrifugal Bumble-puppy had never felt quite right to me in the past, but should I succumb to isolation? Surely, it is better to engage, socialize and build my network: ‘If they shall be lost, then I will not be so pious, and I will be as lost in the pleasure as the rest of the children in the basement, wearing their face paint and animal masks and dancing in the erratic lights.’
My chemical craving was for psychedelic drugs. I arrived at the party, and found two tabs of LSD within three minutes. It would take some time to affect me, and I couldn’t simply sit idle and wait. I found other drugs, and with them, I found acquaintances with a large glass beaker, filled with stale beer to filter the marijuana.
Vaguely familiar faces and persons extended themselves to me and fellows in my circles. We traded facial gestures, and to my lubricated surprise, every tick and motion in every person’s body became an express and sincere communication. Their eyes, though cloudy and near impossible to focus, revealed a beauty only found in the most distinct, singular events. A beauty which dies and renews, and holds you captive in the precious breathe of the moment: My senses were fully extended, like a flower reaching for the sun’s warmth, and then I knew. These acquaintances were humans to be loved, and while we danced in our masks, there was a true sense of communion brewing in that underground.
I understood how we all felt: Of course we needed to lose ourselves in this ritual! Somewhere deep within, we knew we were not the raw, American academics we were told to be: We were primal human beings, who needed to escape into an emotional state of communion. There and then, we could dance, we could love erratically and ecstatically. We could release rage, and we could release all the anxieties we carried over being who we were expected to be. Rituals require us to remember.
Bathing in the warmth all around that I had been too cold to feel, I lost myself. The haze of fog from the machines, the prisms of swinging light: they were no longer solid things, but instead, they were all part of the ocean. In my heart, I felt a correspondence with a larger heart, which pulsed and called out to me. I felt the ecstasy of knowing that the ecstasy had always been there, just in the corner of my eye previously, now at full attention.
What a thing in existence as a party! How powerful in magnitude. How life-filled, as if a great, ineffable heart pumped through everyone present. What ecstasy!
The experience does not (and never does) end there. It continues with the intervention of the authority.
A large fellow dressed in a suit for the occasion blocked the door leading out of the basement. The DJ’s beat was shut down. A few scattered but assertive voices began to cry: “Shut up!” They bellowed, “Everybody, shut your pipes!”
I found this fascinating. People from within the basement, participants in the ritual just moments ago, called for the cessation of celebration. The manic, frenzied banter was hard to subdue, and I felt confusion and anxiety seep from many hearts in the underground, and hang heavily around the ceiling. The command was given several times, again and again for silence. There was mention of police, and so general reason established, but this was the interesting part of the experiment: It relied solely on each person, in this room full of chemical-crazed children, to cease talking, to let go of the heartbeat which fueled them and kept their body-buzz going. What a sight that would’ve been: a complete shift, like watching a flower bud blossom to its potential, and at that pivotal moment, immediately begin to whither into nothingness, of its own volition.
Ultimately, we could not achieve this energetic silence, and the police knocked on the door, and the heart was expelled.
Like the moment itself, the heart was not finished: The pulsing current was still with us, far more at ease than it was in the underground. Emerging truly for the first time, what a marvelous illusion was taking place: the fog machines that enwrapped us underground gave way to wet, heavy fog that fell from the heavens and rested all around us. The police sirens flickered like the party lights below, and as the masses of people poured out into the road like blood from the heart, I truly felt that I was being released.
The house of the party had been down a country road, far away from the main street in town. We walked back through the dreaminess of the night, veiled in fog, with lights that glowed above and hung omnipotent. On this walk back, I contemplated my release further. The ecstasy we children-bred-for-slavery had manufactured together filled every vein and crevasse with the tingling of activity, and turning this wheel of fire together, we communed in a primal way that cannot be taught, only learned. Now that I am aware of it, it will never leave me, and to this moment, I feel all things around me, and all people.
How distracted we are! Our minds are plastered and posted-over with products, images, sounds, videos, and all through a medium of detachment, deceivingly disguised as connection. Being so fully there, walking among the trees that had lived longer than all the people, the people who had busied themselves with themselves, I began to remember the trees. They had been speaking to me from the beginning, and I had always been speaking with them, because I could never draw the breath to speak without them. I took in the air they gave me, and I felt an abundance of that which had always pulsed in me, and had been awakened on this night: Love.
Then, I listened to silence, absence, emptiness, and I became it; for there is no greater state of being than to be empty, wherein the whole is open, and all is welcomed to you. Music is the space between notes.
When I arrived back at my dormitory, I plugged in my ear buds, and thought of a piece of music I had discovered some year ago, one which called to the empty canvass of my passion: “Estampes,1 – Pagodes” by Claude Debussy.
I knew then, and now more than ever, that I am not a creature of science. I am not a computer, and I am not a machine. I am not an indifferent and cold calculation of quantum mechanics. I am a soul: I am a raindrop falling, I am a river flowing, I am a fire burning. Listening to Debussy’s expressions, I see the most beautiful birds springing up from cold, steel ground, spiraling upward, painting the clouded sky in colors that swell, intensify, fade, and pulse with the most instinctive and natural motion, such that its movements could be nothing but inexplicable, divine.
There is a precious flower: a beautiful heart within me and us all, and today, it is far too hard to hear. We are plugged in, ingesting irreverent symbolism, and crude stimulant that numbs our passions, and most importantly, our precious capacity for suffering. We listen to sound bites, we listen to ‘mini-sized’, easy-to-digest rhetoric, purposefully meaningless humor, and regurgitated human constructs. We listen to computers that aggressively fuel us on performance-enhanced sound waves. We are filled with ideas from a sick, mad world. We are dressed in its fancies, taught of its laws/lies, and made to believe we are something we are not.
We must remember who we truly are. How? Listen. Listen carefully. Empty yourself of what has been poured into you. Listen to the world around you, and listen to your heart when it responds to the world. Listen, so you may remember what love is in this world, and so you may welcome the world to you, as it truly is.

Interesting article. It seems you’re saying that humanistic endeavours that include dancing and listening to music allows you to go back into the primal state of humanity, to truly understand what life is; instead of being like a corporate drone like what society is teaching us to do. What do you think is at the end of that tunnel? Can one attain a kind of ‘humanistic perfection’? If so, what is that? Does that consist of me listening to Claude everyday?
Thank you for taking the time:
In my mind, human perfection is not an ultimate point in time and space where where we are completed in whole. Rather, ‘humanistic perfection’ (in your words, as I interpret them) is a state of being, wherein an individual places his or her sense of self in the whole of experience, rather than believing that they only govern their own body. It always endeavors to listen to the things occurring outside of their thoughts. The reason I reference Debussy specifically is twofold: firstly, I believe his music is very reflective to the nature of the world outside of humanity, wherein things move fluidly, and the palette (colors) all blend, rather than be distinct from each other.
All I ask of people is to consider very carefully what creates the sounds they listen to, and whether that essence of creation lends itself favorably to the biological and emotional state of the individual.
I realize this is totally against your principles, but Debussy’s music is pretty romantic in the romanticist sense of getting back to nature and the authentic, pastoral form of human life. The weird thing is that in the last round of romanticism, this kind of provided a fertile ground for proto-fascist ideas. There was a nationalist variant, i.e. get back to the traditions of ‘your people’ and find out who you really are (hint: better than everybody else), and the esoteric variant coming from anthroposophists and Rudolf Steiner and such about getting back to the original form of human life, which led to wacky, aggressive ideas about what man really needs to realize his potential (hint: a lot of struggle and stomping on neighbours).
So while I realize that you aren’t advocating anything like that, and it was probably the product of a specific set of historical circumstances the first time around, what do you think of going even further back for a similar impact from music, which would maybe cheat the devil a little? I realize that Bach might be a little too regimented and schematic (or is he?), but what about Hildegard of Bingen? (example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJEfyZSvg5c)
Or how about something contemporary? ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W2msmbJCKM
or, if that is too soundtracky: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytQLA77X6Qw
(I honestly urge you to listen to these pieces, preferably without any surrounding distractions)
Yeah, sorry, just being contrarian again, but:
“All I ask of people is to consider very carefully what creates the sounds they listen to” – Why? No, seriously, why? Maybe I subscribe to the death of the author a bit too much, but I don’t see why this is something people should consider very carefully. I don’t see – in this respect – a difference between Debussy and Aphex Twin (both great), or between Bach and Rosetta (dito), or [...].
I don’t think a solo piano piece could ever come as close to perfection as Rosetta’s A Determinism of Morality (More namedropping! Music is just something I am very passionate about), because six instruments will always be able to create more complexity than one. Don’t get me wrong, I love me some Debussy, but I don’t see it as being half as powerful.
I dunno, this just seems too hippy-esque to me.
There is a post of mine very related to this, but I lent it to someone for half a year, so I can’t reproduce it right now. :/
1. That was an excellent call on going hyper-contemporary as opposed to really old. Debussy is pretty modern in the sense that its pretty sentimental but almost geometrically arranged. It’s kind of the sweeter version of Ravel but with the same kind of aesthetic. If you want to break out of that, you have to jump out of its history, i.e. into the atavism of history or into post-melody.
2. Fabius, you ‘lent’ a post? What does that mean? You have no copy of the file, or what? And man, you gotta start posting. You got ideas and a sharp mind. How about something about music? That’s a category we don’t have yet, but it seems like we need one.
You Germans and your old German music (that’s you too fabius).
The only time I listen to Bach is when the tax people put me on hold – I get to listen to Bach on loop 30948983 times. I’m an expert now.
Also I can’t stop laughing at Fabius’ comment.
It seems like wanderings (the author) feels that the end point is merely to enhance and enrich your own experience – therefore drugs. But these things have an outcome that exceeds personal dramas. Perhaps we should attempt to push and further our endeavours in that direction, wanderings.
Thank you all so much for your thoughts (and beautiful music) which shapes and re informs me.
As I take the time to listen to the videos you’ve shown me, I’ve started to think that certainly, there is no objective ear. We can say then that music is timeless. I also think we can agree that all of the music that has been put forward demonstrates some kind of human reflection of the world around them.
With the Hildegard, apparently various scholars have made associations with her music and the female body, along with a sense of fertility and ‘greenness’. She made expressions based on the view of the world she was given.
So when I say to consider the source of creation behind what you listen to, of course I can’t say that music “naturally” derived is objectively superior or healthier for human being than electronic music.
To me, it is simply a consideration of who and what you choose to remember. It is also a consideration of what you choose to make a part of you, because I would certainly advocate that your brain is formed by the things you decide to listen to. Not to say that heavy metal and ‘angry’ industrial music will rot your mind, only to say that those are sounds that have been loaded with emotional expression from another human, and you are listening to them, and cultivating your own emotional expression out of it.
Fabius, I actually found A Determinism of Morality online a few years back and really lost myself in it, what coincidence! I think i’ll play it tonight.
And Nachlasse, I had hoped that the essay would encourage us to further our endeavors to live more outside ourselves, in greater communion with all other living things, and the best drug for that (in my mind) is music.
I am reesentink your Implikation zat I vood be konfined to such a zing as Nazionality (no sic). I vood much razzer be konsidered post-Kontinental, vitch is similar to but not ze same as, proto-Kosmopolitan.
Rejektink beauty in ze Manner of ze Filistine iz no Indikator of Erudition. Just because ze crass petit Bourgeois, or as vee say ‘Kleinbürger’, of zis Staate agency reduce Bach to a Distraktion from zair own Inkompetenz duz not also imply zat you must negate ze sublime Power of his Musik, especially its revolutionary Konnotations in historical Kontext.
In dooink zis you are missink ze vay Bach to ze Future, but zair I just make little Joke.